Saturday, April 8, 2017

THEM! (1954)

Rated: NR
Run Time: 94 minutes
Director: Gordon Douglas
Starring: James Whitmore, Edmund Gwenn, Joan Weldon
THEM!’s entertainment value as a horror film is intrinsically noteworthy in itself without any examination of its significance in post-WWII American culture as a metaphor for its citizens’ fear of atomic power in an ever more dangerous geopolitical world.  Yet it was also just that: a very contextually relevant movie relative to the era within which it was made.  I have never been shy in voicing my admiration for Stephen King, both regarding his work as an author and his critical commentary on the genre within which he works: bottom line, Stephen King is a passionate horror aficionado who has what I consider to be a keen understanding of how horror works, in either film or print.  That we must explore the impact of horror film and literature through the prism of its sociological import is perhaps not wholly original, but King’s articulation of the theory in Danse Macabre is a comprehensive refinement of the notion.   At its very core, horror is a genre replete with cautionary tales; its monsters and ghosts are metaphors and symbols used to explore our fears across a largely allegorical landscape (except for exploitation fare like the slasher subgenre; that’s just all about tits and gore).  There is no greater validation of this theory to be found than in the horror/sci-fi of the 1950s, in America and elsewhere.

Released three years after the Hawks/Nyby, The Thing, and within the same year as Gojira/Godzilla (itself, we must remember, Tojo Studios’ answer to The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms), THEM! was one of the first (not the first) movies to address the potentially disastrous consequences facing humanity in the very new nuclear world if we did not treat “Oppenheimer’s deadly toy” with care.  Pandora’s Box had been breached.  While the consequences of those fateful discoveries are still being played out in the post-modern world, that’s not what we’re concerned with today.

I do believe THEM! has the distinction of being the first giant insect movie, although I suppose Wells in part got there first in literature, as he so often did, with Food of the Gods.

THEM!’s opening immediately immerses us in the action that propels the story (there’s not a lot of fat on the movie’s bones):  A New Mexico State Police cruiser and airplane are liaisoning ground to air to confirm the report of a civilian aircraft pilot who said he saw a little girl walking, apparently aimlessly, through the desert.  Just before they turn in for the day, the pilot spots the girl.  He wheels around and turns back to where he saw movement and at this point, the plane is very much the focal point of the camera.  Then the camera draws back and downward, showing us the desert-scape.  A little girl with pigtails who is holding a doll walks right into the frame and the camera begins to follow her advance.  This is a neat idea; I’m not sure why, but I’ve never seen anything quite like it.  
The girl appears catatonic and is displaying one serious-ass thousand yard stare.

The sergeant of the cruiser, Ben Peterson (a young James Whitmore), brings the girl back to the car.  The pilot announces he’s found a trailer/mobile home.  When Ben and his partner respond to this scene, they observe several bizarre things:  an unusual impression in the ground (a sort of print), a ransacked interior whose metal façade has been ripped or shredded outward, the presence of sugar cubes within and without the mobile home, bloody clothing, other torn fabric, money intact (not a robbery) and a small revolver.  Ben does the old (and much-maligned among forensic scientists) “pick up the gun by sticking a fucking pen in the barrel, thus possibly altering the interior of the barrel such that a later identification cannot be made using unique rifling characteristics .” 

Forensic firearms analysis in 1954 was almost certainly not as advanced at that point, but, even if the sub-discipline were technologically capable of such examinations, because, as it turn out, it doesn’t really matter anyway because our suspects are (***SPOILER ALERT***) giant-ass ants who couldn’t hold a tiny gun like that in their little claw hands anyway.  Ben also finds a piece of the little girl’s missing doll (a portion of the pre-fabricated head).  This is explained without a word of dialogue as Ben silently demonstrates to his partner how both the small swatch of fabric and the piece of the doll’s head fit together like pieces of a puzzle; a wordless and intelligent example of “show, don’t tell” cinematic technique.  Now we know where the little girl came from.

Ben’s partner tells us that we have ourselves a 914 (exactly what I was thinking).  The police request the assistance of crime scene investigators and an ambulance for the girl.  When she is safely loaded, we hear for the first time a creepy and exceedingly high-pitched screeching noise.  The girl bolts upright and wide-eyed in her stretcher, until the noise stops.  I appreciate the interesting ways the film builds tension by showing us step by step that we need to be afraid of something, because the little girl sure as hell is, even before we know what it is we should be afraid of.

Ben and his partner next visit the local gas station/feed supply/convenience store called “Johnson’s” owned and run by Gramps (I thought they called him Cramps, at first), where they find present many of the same phenomena as at the trailer site: wooden siding ripped outward, the place ransacked but nothing missing from the cash register, a shotgun with its barrel bent crooked, and sugar spilled from a barrel that is crawling with hundreds of tiny ants (Ben casually runs his fingers through the sugar and ants; it’s a smart visual and a bit of clever foreshadowing simultaneously).  Gramps is there, too, but he’s deader than the proverbial door nail, lying there in the cellar wide-eyed and bespattered with blood.  Ladies and gentlemen, it looks like another damned 914.

Ben and partner split up as darkness descends and we hear that awful, eerie, high-pitched screeching sound.  The deputy (whose name I don’t remember, but let’s call him Barnie for convenience’s sake because he’s about to die anyway), revolver drawn, goes to investigate.  This, as it turns out, is a rather regrettable decision. 

The next day, the New Mexico police authorities (which is pretty much just Ben at this point, what with Barnie being dead and all) learn the little girl is the only survivor of a family whose dad was an F.B.I. agent.  The family was apparently vacationing in, that’s right, the fucking desert.  Why the G-man would bring his whole family out into nowhere is beyond me; literally, the trailer’s in the middle of the goddamned New Mexico desert.  Anyway, because of the newly-discovered federal nexus, the F.B.I. sends out one of their own, another special agent, to assist in the investigation.  The agent’s name is Robert Graham and he’s played with a sort of breezy authority by James Arness, who really was one tall motherfucker.  He was, of course, the original “The Thing” itself, and it was his towering stature that lent that film whatever frightening aura it possesses (I happen to think it possesses quite a lot).

The group gathered learn from the pathologist who performed the autopsy that Gramps could have died of several different injuries or afflictions: neck and back broken, chest crushed, skull fractured, and enough formic acid in him to kill twenty men.  How exactly he would know what a lethal dose of formic acid was is a mystery?  Perhaps Mengele experimented with it at Auschwitz (those Germans and their meticulous documentation).  Ladies and gentlemen, we’re closing in on WTF time.  Then the New Mexico captain goes off and says this asinine thing, like they have “…lots of evidence loaded with clues.”  What?  It reminded me of Churchill’s famous statement about the inscrutability of the Soviet Union, except when Churchill said it, it made sense.

So now it’s time to call in the experts, and who do they choose?  Entomologists, that’s who.  Why?  Well, that‘s a damned good question.  Sure, we know from the poster that giant ants are at the bottom of this crisis, but they certainly have no reason to believe so at this juncture.  The entomologists are the Drs. Medford, father and daughter.  The two quickly (and rather cryptically) make a connection between the White Sands, New Mexico, site of the explosion of the first atomic bomb, and the strange phenomena they are made privy to and which they presently witness.  Do they share any of this with the authorities?  No, no they don’t.  They just keep on with the cryptic innuendo without really saying much of anything we or the authorities can make sense of.  Perhaps, we should not be too surprised.  Medford the Elder is, after all, the world’s foremost myrmecologist (which I figured was an expert on mythical aquatic half-women, half-fish creatures).  Father and daughter toss out words like “Formicidae.”  Cryptically…  

Anyway, taking the presence of formic acid into consideration, the senior Dr. Medford waves a small jar of the stuff under the silent little girl’s nose as an experiment of sorts.  Of course, we all know where this is going: she flips her shit.  Her heretofore frozen, unblinking eyes begin to rapidly rise and fall and she screams.  She jumps out of her chair and runs to the closest thing to a corner, shouting, “Them! Them!”  Interestingly, this won’t be the last time they (the ants, that is) are referred to as such.  There next step, as night falls, is to take another trip to the desert.  Before they do so, Graham tells the older man, “It’s getting late out there, doctor,” to which Medford Senior replies, “Later than you think.”  Cryptically…

In the desert, the doctors, still maintaining silence about their working theory, discuss the possibility that whatever is responsible for the recent disappearances has turned carnivorous because its natural diet has become sparse.  I’m no scientist, but I don’t think it works that way.  Besides, aren’t ants carnivorous anyway?  No matter…  The junior doctor, Pat, separates from the men to investigate something just below a crest or ridge of sand when that screeching noise returns.  Pat obliviously looks downward when the head of a gigantic ant with enormous mandibles ascends the crest and provides us our first look at the film’s villains.  We’re off… 

The remainder of the film is a thrilling and suspenseful race against the clock to destroy the ants before THEY overrun and destroy us.  As Mr. Dr. Medford says, they are a “A fantastic mutation probably caused by lingering radiation from the first atomic bomb.”  Directed by Gordon Douglas, THEM! is a tautly paced thriller as the authorities and scientists, on the same page in this one in terms of knowing the ants must be destroyed, first eradicate a nest only to find two breeders who can fly have escaped.  Speaking of that, hell, it’s even got Fess Parker in a bit part right before the launch of “Davy Crocket.”  The effort to both locate the ants and find a way to destroy them assumes the remainder of the movie’s running time, leading to the justly famous climax within the storm drains of the City of Angels.     

So, here we have our first Man vs. Nature, sub-category: Giant Insect Movie, with the horrible causative factor being radioactive nuclear fallout; this, together with alien invaders (those fucking communists), would be the well from which 50s fantastic cinema would draw again and again, but perhaps never so successfully or as intelligently as here.  (Save for Godzilla, of course, which uses its monster-as-metaphor for nuclear annihilation with a different twist).  “THEM!” is a deserved classic, a well-crafted movie with sympathetic characters and believable special effects.  The resolution in the L. A. storm drains is creepy and a lastingly iconic image of fantastic cinema & horror/sci-fi (often copied and later parodied lovingly by Larry Cohen’s “It’s Alive!”).  If the film were made today, the denouement after Dr. Medford’s final cautious remarks about what the future might hold would almost certainly contain a final scene showing a nest of giant ant eggs beginning to hatch in some remote and unknown location.

DISPARATE THOUGHTS
Wonderful imagery:
The aerial and then ground view of the ant at the apex of the desert nest with a human rib cage in its mandibles; the ant drops the detritus and it rolls down the hill past skulls and other bleached human bones (and the missing officer’s Sam Brown belt).

The first glimpse of the very heart of the first colony’s nest:  You can see motion within the yet hatched eggs, all mist and glistening sacs; I would be surprised if Ridley Scott did not copy this image as a jumping point for the visuals of the facehugger/queen’s eggs in Alien.

The last view from above (camera vantage, that is) of the latest winged queens, heads swaying and mandibles clenching and unclenching…justly famous.

Beautiful New Mexico desert setting, all large cacti and sagebrush, winds and sands…and big fucking ants.

First of the oversized animal that otherwise appears naturally in the world and wreaks terrible destruction movies (JawsGrizzly, Claws, The Swarm, Squirm, Snowbeast (hey, I believe in Yetis), etc.) – the first age feared nuclear fallout, the next alienation and distrust of government in the wake of Vietnam (Night of the Living Dead, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes) the next age toxic waste (Toxic Avenger, C.H.U.D, Return of the Living Dead, Prophesy,)…what next, I wonder?    

About that earlier comment that slasher flicks are just for horny teenage boys: It would seem that even slasher horror has sociological merit (however dubious).  Carol J. Glover, whom I would identify, rightly or wrongly, as a Freudian feminist (in just that order), has quite a bit to say about the subtext of these otherwise disposable films.  I’m looking for a copy of her Men, Women, & Chainsaws, but if you, like me, have a difficult time finding that one, check out her essay in Screening Violence, itself a tremendously informative look at the historical, aesthetic, and social aspects of violence in cinema.

The Horror Inkwell Rating: 8/10



No comments:

Post a Comment